Category: summer

  • Auto Zeitung tests the best tires for sports cars

    Auto Zeitung tests the best tires for sports cars

    Discover the Best Summer Performance Tires According to Auto Zeitung’s 2025 Test

    Top 5 performance tires according to Auto Zeitung’s 2025 test: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, Continental PremiumContact 7, Bridgestone Potenza Sport, Michelin Pilot Sport 5, and Pirelli P Zero PZ4.

    Auto Zeitung’s 2025 Summer Tire Test: Ten Ultra-High-Performance (UHP) Tires Evaluated

    The top five tires for sports cars, as tested by Auto Zeitung, Germany’s renowned automotive publication.

    Summer tire testing for the upcoming season has begun. This time, Auto Zeitung selected ten high-performance tires and rigorously evaluated them.

    Not all tires are created equal. Just as there are significant price differences between budget and premium tires, there are also major variations in tread performance, durability, and grip—key factors highlighted in this test.

    The tested tires ranged from two budget Chinese models—the Mastersteel Super Sport 2 and Triangle EffeXSport TH202—to mid-range options like the Falken Azenis FK520, Toyo Proxes Sport 2, and Vredestein Ultrac Pro, and finally premium contenders: Bridgestone Potenza Sport, Continental PremiumContact 7, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, Michelin Pilot Sport 5, and Pirelli P Zero.

    Technically, the Continental tire isn’t strictly a UHP (Ultra-High Performance) model, as it was designed for touring. However, in Auto Zeitung’s 2024 summer tire test, it demonstrated such solid performance and dynamic handling that it earned a spot in this competitive lineup.

    The Tires and Test Vehicle

    Tire size: 225/45R18, suitable for compact and midsize cars.

    Test vehicle: Skoda Octavia Combi 1.5 TSI with 150 hp (110 kW) and a manual transmission (Selection trim). Equipped with adaptive dampers for improved comfort and dynamics, the car ran on 18-inch wheels and completed the 4,000 km test without issues.


    Results of Auto Zeitung’s 2025 Summer UHP Tire Test

    🏆 1st Place – Test Winner

    Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (Highly Recommended)
    225/45 R18 95Y
    Score: 279/300
    Advantages:
    ✅ Fastest wet handling time
    ✅ Shortest wet braking distance
    ✅ Best dry performance


    🥈 2nd Place

    Continental PremiumContact 7 (Highly Recommended)
    225/45 R18 95Y
    Score: 274/300
    Advantages:
    ✅ Shortest wet braking distance
    ✅ Strong wet grip
    ✅ Best ride comfort


    🥉 3rd Place – Best Value for Money

    Bridgestone Potenza Sport (Highly Recommended)
    225/45 R18 95Y
    Score: 265/300
    Advantages:
    ✅ Strong wet grip
    ✅ Shortest dry braking distance
    ✅ High slalom speed
    Disadvantages:
    High rolling resistance


    4th Place

    Michelin Pilot Sport 5 (Highly Recommended)
    225/45 R18 95Y
    Score: 260/300
    Advantages:
    ✅ Low wear
    ✅ Good aquaplaning resistance
    Disadvantages:
    Early understeer


    5th Place

    Pirelli P Zero PZ4 SC (Highly Recommended)
    225/45 ZR18 95Y
    Score: 254/300
    Advantages:
    ✅ Strong wet grip
    ✅ Agile handling
    Disadvantages:
    Long wet braking distance
    Moderate wear
    Low ride comfort


    6th Place

    Vredestein Ultrac Pro
    225/45 ZR18 95Y
    Score: 230/300
    Advantages:
    ✅ Good aquaplaning resistance
    Disadvantages:
    Long wet braking distance
    Average dry performance


    7th Place

    Toyo Proxes Sport 2
    225/45 ZR18 95Y
    Score: 228/300
    Advantages:
    ✅ Short dry braking distance
    ✅ Fastest dry lap time
    Disadvantages:
    Moderate wet performance
    Moderate wear


    8th Place

    Falken Azenis FK520
    225/45 R18 95Y
    Score: 219/300
    Advantages:
    ✅ Good durability
    Disadvantages:
    Weak wet grip
    Long wet braking distance


    9th Place

    Triangle EffeXSport TH202
    225/45 R18 95Y
    Score: 167/300
    Disadvantages:
    Weak wet grip
    Long wet braking distance
    High wear


    10th Place

    Mastersteel Super Sport 2
    225/45 R18 95Y
    Score: 154/300
    Advantages:
    ✅ Low rolling resistance
    Disadvantages:
    Weak wet grip
    Long wet braking distance
    Long dry braking distance


    Conclusions

    🏆 Goodyear combines performance and sustainability at the highest level, making it the clear winner.
    🥈 Continental takes second place thanks to its exceptional wet grip.
    🥉 Bridgestone earns third for its sporty focus and value for money.
    📉 The balanced and durable Michelin and the decent Pirelli follow. Meanwhile, Vredestein, Toyo, and Falken can’t compete with premium models but have their strengths. The budget Triangle and Mastersteel tires aren’t viable alternatives.

    We hope this information is helpful…

    The 225/45R18 tire size fits the following car models:

    Alfa Romeo Giulia
    Audi A3 allstreet, A4, A5
    BMW 1, 2, 3, 4, X1, Z4
    Citroën C4
    DS 4, DS 4 Crossback
    Fiat 500X
    Ford C-Max, Tourneo Connect
    Genesis G70
    Honda Accord, HR-V
    Hyundai i40, Kona, Sonata
    Jaguar XE, XJ
    Kia Niro, Stinger
    Mazda CX-3, 3, 6, RX-8
    Mercedes A-, B-, C-Class, CLA
    Mini Countryman
    Nissan Juke, Leaf
    Opel Astra, Insignia
    Peugeot 3008
    Renault Latitude, (Grand) Scenic
    Seat Alhambra

  • The best high-performance summer tires – Test 2025

    The best high-performance summer tires – Test 2025

    AutoBild Reveals the Best Summer Performance Tires in the 2025 Braking Test

    The best summer performance tires according to AutoBild in the 2025 braking test: Bridgestone Potenza Sport, Michelin Pilot Sport 5, Hankook Ventus Evo K137, Kumho Ecsta PS71, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, Falken Ziex ZE320, Continental PremiumContact 7, Linglong Sport Master, among others.

    AutoBild, the renowned German automotive magazine, recently conducted its large-scale test of high-performance summer tires (braking test), selecting a total of 52 tires from premium, mid-range, and budget brands

    In the end, a total of 20 tires passed this qualifying test for the final round. There were some surprises, as some budget tires appeared in the top positions of the ranking. All tires are rated as high-speed, with speed symbols Y and W.  

    The selected vehicle was a Toyota Yaris GR, a compact car with high-performance capabilities.

    Dry braking tests were conducted at 100 km/h, and wet road tests were conducted at 80 km/h.

    The Top 20 High-Performance Tires in the AutoBild 2025 Braking Test

    BrakingBrakingBraking
    PositionDescriptionSizeIC/IVWet in metersDry in metersTotal in meters
    1Bridgestone Potenza Sport225/40R1892 Y27.632.660.2
    2Michelin Pilot Sport 5225/40R1892 Y27.733.561.2
    3Hankook Ventus Evo K137225/40R1892 Y27.43461.4
    4Kumho Ecsta PS71225/40R1892 Y27.434.261.6
    5Linglong Sport Master225/40R1892 Y27.434.261.6
    6Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6225/40R1892 Y28.334.162.4
    7Falken Ziex ZE320 92 W225/40R1892 W29.53362.5
    8Continental PremiumContact 7225/40R1892 Y28.334.662.9
    9Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2225/40R1892 Y28.734.363
    10Maxxis Victra Sport 5225/40R1892 Y29.233.963.1
    11Toyo Proxes Comfort 92 W225/40R1892 W30.43464.4
    12Laufenn S Fit EQ+225/40R1892 Y29.734.964.6
    13Nokian Powerproof 1225/40R1892 Y30.434.865.2
    14Yokohama Advan Sport V107225/40R1892 Y31.833.865.6
    15Firestone Firehawk Sport225/40R1892 Y31.134.665.7
    16Nexen N Fera Sport225/40R1892 Y30.93565.9
    17Giti Giti Sport S2225/40R1892 Y30.935.466.3
    18Vredestein Ultrac Pro225/40R1892 Y31.23566.2
    19Dunlop Sport Maxx RT2225/40R1892 Y31.535.266.7
    20Pirelli P Zero PZ4225/40R1892 Y32.334.667
    Table: The best performance tires in the AutoBild Summer 2025 Test

    At the end of the article, the remaining tires competing in the AutoBild braking test are shown. AutoBild.

    Analysis of the High-Performance Tire Test Results

    Some considerations about the results of the AutoBild 2025 braking test with high-performance summer tires:

    1. Premium brands still lead, but not always by a wide margin

    Bridgestone Potenza Sport achieved the best overall performance with the shortest total braking distance (60.2 m), closely followed by Michelin Pilot Sport 5 (61.2 m) and Hankook Ventus Evo K137 (61.4 m).

    Other premium brands like Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (62.4m) and Continental PremiumContact 7 (62.9m) were slightly behind but still in the top 10.

    2. Surprising results from mid-range and budget high-performance tires

    Kumho Ecsta PS71 (61.6m) and Linglong Sport Master (61.6m) tied for 4th place, outperforming well-known premium brands.

    Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 (63.0m), another budget tire, ranked in the top 10, showing strong braking performance despite its low price.

    This suggests that some mid-range and budget brands have made significant progress in braking performance.

    3. Wet braking vs. Dry braking – Advantages and disadvantages

    The best tire in wet conditions was the Hankook Ventus Evo K137 (27.4m), along with the Kumho Ecsta PS71, outperforming the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 (27.7m) and Bridgestone Potenza Sport (27.6m).

    However, in dry conditions, Bridgestone (32.6 m) took the lead, while other high-performance wet tires had slightly longer braking distances.

    Some tires excelled in both wet and dry conditions, but the best performers balance both scenarios.

    4. Some premium brands that did not perform as expected

    Pirelli P Zero PZ4 (67.0m) ranked lower than expected, taking the 20th position.

    Dunlop Sport Maxx RT2 (66.7m) also underperformed compared to mid-range competitors like Sailun and Maxxis.

    These results show that even well-established premium brands can sometimes be outperformed by newer or more aggressive mid-range brands.

    5. Longer braking distances pose a higher risk

    The bottom five tires had braking distances exceeding 75 m, significantly worse than the leaders.

    Autogreen Smart Chaser SC1 (81.9 m) had the worst results, with a wet braking distance of 43.6 m, nearly 16 meters longer than the best tire.

    Brands like Tigar, RoyalBlack, and Arivo also struggled, confirming that some budget brands still have significant performance drawbacks.

    6. Safety implications: A difference of over 20 meters can save lives

    The difference in braking distance between the best and worst tires in wet conditions was over 16 meters, a difference of four car lengths, which poses a high risk to road safety. 

    On dry roads, the difference was smaller but still significant, highlighting the importance of tire choice in emergency braking situations.

    Final Thoughts

    Bridgestone, Michelin, and Hankook continue to dominate the high-performance tire segment, offering the best balance of safety and braking.

    Mid-range brands like Kumho, Linglong, and Sailun are closing the gap with premium brands, making them good alternatives for budget-conscious buyers.

    When deciding to purchase budget tires, avoid the cheapest brands if safety is a priority, as their braking distances are much longer than those of premium or mid-range brands.

    We hope this information is useful!

    Remaining 32 tires tested in the Auto Bild braking test

    BrakingBrakingBraking
    PositionDescriptionSizeIC/IVWet in metersDry in metersTotal in meters
    21GT Radial SportActive 2225/40R1892 Y31.73667.7
    22Uniroyal RainSport 5225/40R1892 Y30.337.467.7
    23BF Goodrich Advantage225/40R1892 Y31.936.268.1
    24Petlas Velox Sport PT 741225/40R1892 Y33.135.468.5
    25Semperit Speed Life 3225/40R1892 Y31.237.468.6
    26Syron Premium Performance225/40R1892 Y31.936.968.8
    27Debica Presto UHP 2225/40R1892 Y33.136.469.5
    28Ceat SportDrive225/40R1892 Y3435.869.8
    29Leao Nova Force Acro225/40R1892 Y32.936.869.7
    30Fulda SportControl 2225/40R1892 Y33.936.270.1
    31Radar Dimax R8+225/40R1892 Y31.738.670.3
    32Sava Intensa UHP 2225/40R1892 Y34.435.970.3
    33Viking ProTech NewGen225/40R1892 Y33.537.671.1
    34Star Performer Interstellar 92 W225/40R1892 W33.737.571.2
    35Event Potentem UHP 92 W225/40R1892 W33.837.971.7
    36Gislaved Ultra Speed ​​2225/40R1892 Y34.237.671.8
    37Matador Hectorra 5225/40R1892 Y34.137.771.8
    38Ovation VI-588 Sport225/40R1892 Y35.237.172.3
    39Barum Bravuris 6225/40R1892 Y34.837.672.4
    40Kormoran Ultra High Performance225/40R1892 Y36.236.672.8
    41Yartu ZuperEco Z-107 92 W225/40R1892 W34.937.972.8
    42Iris Sefar 92 W225/40R1892 W35.137.973
    43Windforce Catchfors UHP PRO 92 W225/40R1892 W36.736.573.2
    44Lanvigator Catch Power Plus 92 W225/40R1892 W36.737.273.9
    45Riken Ultra High Performance225/40R1892 Y37.536.974.4
    46Z Max Zealion 92 W225/40R1892 W3837.575.5
    47Rockblade ROCK 525 92 W225/40R1892 W38.137.575.6
    48Arivo Ultra ARZ-5 92 W225/40R1892 W37.638.175.7
    49Tigar Ultra High Performance225/40R1892 Y38.437.676
    50Tourador X Speed ​​TU1225/40R1892 Y37.138.976
    51RoyalBlack Explorer II225/40R1892 Y38.638.477
    52Autogreen Smart Chaser SC1 92 W225/40R1892 W43.638.381.9
    Table: The best sports tires Test: AutoBild Summer 2025